Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Management
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States

80.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 18927, Pennsylvania 100.0% 10.4% (+89.6)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#1
2. 89828, Nevada 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#2
3. 84530, Utah 100.0% 11.5% (+88.5)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#3
4. 33877, Florida 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#4
5. 65479, Missouri 100.0% 10.5% (+89.5)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#5
6. 82833, Wyoming 100.0% 12.1% (+87.9)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#6
7. 92259, California 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#7
8. 87315, New Mexico 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#8
9. 67071, Kansas 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#9
10. 46789, Indiana 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#10
11. 76841, Texas 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#11
12. 95606, California 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#12
13. 21810, Maryland 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#13
14. 24412, Virginia 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#14
15. 24881, West Virginia 100.0% 8.3% (+91.7)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#15
16. 12429, New York 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#16
17. 24719, West Virginia 100.0% 8.3% (+91.7)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#17
18. 40939, Kentucky 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#18
19. 70340, Louisiana 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#19
20. 00934, Puerto Rico 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#20
21. 96068, California 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#21
22. 10519, New York 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#22
23. 97751, Oregon 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#23
24. 82640, Wyoming 100.0% 12.1% (+87.9)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#24
25. 40049, Kentucky 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#25
26. 88324, New Mexico 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#26
27. 81522, Colorado 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#27
28. 85922, Arizona 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#28
29. 00694, Puerto Rico 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#29
30. 26435, West Virginia 100.0% 8.3% (+91.7)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#30
31. 72038, Arkansas 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#31
32. 57792, South Dakota 100.0% 12.6% (+87.4)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#32
33. 27594, North Carolina 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#33
34. 18323, Pennsylvania 100.0% 10.4% (+89.6)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#34
35. 88255, New Mexico 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#35
36. 38765, Mississippi 100.0% 8.6% (+91.4)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#36
37. 93554, California 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#4 11.0% (+89.0)#38
38. 95944, California 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#5 11.0% (+89.0)#39
39. 78851, Texas 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#40
40. 79330, Texas 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#41
41. 43523, Ohio 100.0% 10.5% (+89.5)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#42
42. 79259, Texas 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#4 11.0% (+89.0)#43
43. 77960, Texas 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#5 11.0% (+89.0)#44
44. 95981, California 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#6 11.0% (+89.0)#45
45. 89830, Nevada 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#46
46. 30289, Georgia 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#47
47. 80426, Colorado 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#48
48. 98238, Washington 100.0% 12.0% (+88.0)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#49
49. 15072, Pennsylvania 100.0% 10.4% (+89.6)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#50
50. 95325, California 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#7 11.0% (+89.0)#51
51. 59223, Montana 100.0% 12.5% (+87.5)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#52
52. 77617, Texas 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#6 11.0% (+89.0)#53
53. 01097, Massachusetts 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#54
54. 97920, Oregon 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#55
55. 21031, Maryland 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#56
56. 72441, Arkansas 100.0% 9.6% (+90.4)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#57
57. 30756, Georgia 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#58
58. 89831, Nevada 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#59
59. 82929, Wyoming 100.0% 12.1% (+87.9)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#60
60. 82332, Wyoming 100.0% 12.1% (+87.9)#4 11.0% (+89.0)#61
61. 32634, Florida 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#62
62. 96116, California 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#8 11.0% (+89.0)#63
63. 82058, Wyoming 100.0% 12.1% (+87.9)#5 11.0% (+89.0)#64
64. 99825, Alaska 100.0% 10.8% (+89.2)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#65
65. 79073, Texas 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#7 11.0% (+89.0)#66
66. 77986, Texas 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#8 11.0% (+89.0)#67
67. 39148, Mississippi 100.0% 8.6% (+91.4)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#69
68. 83337, Idaho 100.0% 10.9% (+89.1)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#70
69. 88347, New Mexico 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#4 11.0% (+89.0)#71
70. 87730, New Mexico 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#5 11.0% (+89.0)#72
71. 62266, Illinois 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#73
72. 65409, Missouri 100.0% 10.5% (+89.5)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#74
73. 81021, Colorado 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#3 11.0% (+89.0)#75
74. 92364, California 100.0% 11.2% (+88.8)#9 11.0% (+89.0)#76
75. 24322, Virginia 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#78
76. 58310, North Dakota 100.0% 12.3% (+87.7)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#79
77. 59312, Montana 100.0% 12.5% (+87.5)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#80
78. 82844, Wyoming 100.0% 12.1% (+87.9)#6 11.0% (+89.0)#81
79. 38021, Tennessee 100.0% 10.4% (+89.6)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#82
80. 74477, Oklahoma 100.0% 10.1% (+89.9)#1 11.0% (+89.0)#83
81. 67150, Kansas 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#2 11.0% (+89.0)#84
82. 88115, New Mexico 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#6 11.0% (+89.0)#85
83. 89426, Nevada 98.5% 9.4% (+89.1)#4 11.0% (+87.4)#86
84. 97905, Oregon 96.4% 11.4% (+84.9)#3 11.0% (+85.3)#87
85. 97837, Oregon 91.7% 11.4% (+80.2)#4 11.0% (+80.6)#88
86. 78075, Texas 90.2% 10.9% (+79.3)#9 11.0% (+79.2)#89
87. 20889, Maryland 90.0% 12.2% (+77.8)#3 11.0% (+79.0)#90
88. 82925, Wyoming 88.7% 12.1% (+76.6)#7 11.0% (+77.7)#91
89. 82731, Wyoming 88.4% 12.1% (+76.3)#8 11.0% (+77.4)#92
90. 59529, Montana 88.0% 12.5% (+75.5)#3 11.0% (+77.0)#93
91. 57420, South Dakota 87.1% 12.6% (+74.5)#2 11.0% (+76.1)#94
92. 81638, Colorado 87.0% 13.1% (+73.8)#4 11.0% (+75.9)#95
93. 78143, Texas 86.1% 10.9% (+75.2)#10 11.0% (+75.1)#96
94. 68711, Nebraska 85.0% 11.3% (+73.7)#1 11.0% (+74.0)#97
95. 59461, Montana 85.0% 12.5% (+72.5)#4 11.0% (+74.0)#98
96. 23416, Virginia 85.0% 12.2% (+72.8)#3 11.0% (+74.0)#99
97. 88417, New Mexico 83.3% 9.9% (+73.4)#7 11.0% (+72.3)#100
98. 96085, California 83.3% 11.2% (+72.1)#10 11.0% (+72.3)#101
99. 72075, Arkansas 83.3% 9.6% (+73.7)#3 11.0% (+72.3)#102
100. 41845, Kentucky 83.0% 9.6% (+73.4)#3 11.0% (+72.0)#103

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States?
18927 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States is 11.0%.