Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Cleaning & Maintenance
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States

30.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 30454, Georgia 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#1
2. 37396, Tennessee 100.0% 3.4% (+96.6)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#2
3. 85328, Arizona 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#3
4. 22432, Virginia 100.0% 3.1% (+96.9)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#4
5. 40350, Kentucky 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#5
6. 18223, Pennsylvania 100.0% 3.1% (+96.9)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#6
7. 93429, California 100.0% 3.7% (+96.3)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#7
8. 24316, Virginia 100.0% 3.1% (+96.9)#2 3.5% (+96.5)#8
9. 40058, Kentucky 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#2 3.5% (+96.5)#9
10. 39595, Mississippi 100.0% 3.6% (+96.4)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#10
11. 12864, New York 100.0% 3.6% (+96.4)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#11
12. 73746, Oklahoma 100.0% 3.6% (+96.4)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#12
13. 41607, Kentucky 91.5% 3.3% (+88.2)#3 3.5% (+88.1)#13
14. 70082, Louisiana 84.3% 3.7% (+80.6)#1 3.5% (+80.8)#14
15. 33855, Florida 82.6% 4.4% (+78.2)#1 3.5% (+79.1)#15
16. 26266, West Virginia 80.4% 3.7% (+76.7)#1 3.5% (+76.9)#16
17. 56720, Minnesota 77.8% 3.0% (+74.8)#1 3.5% (+74.3)#17
18. 24884, West Virginia 77.3% 3.7% (+73.5)#2 3.5% (+73.8)#18
19. 81138, Colorado 76.2% 2.9% (+73.3)#1 3.5% (+72.7)#19
20. 45428, Ohio 75.0% 3.2% (+71.8)#1 3.5% (+71.5)#20
21. 59035, Montana 73.5% 3.8% (+69.7)#1 3.5% (+70.0)#21
22. 92369, California 71.4% 3.7% (+67.7)#2 3.5% (+67.9)#22
23. 49942, Michigan 71.4% 3.4% (+68.0)#1 3.5% (+67.9)#23
24. 95429, California 69.2% 3.7% (+65.5)#3 3.5% (+65.7)#24
25. 57794, South Dakota 64.1% 3.4% (+60.7)#1 3.5% (+60.6)#25
26. 79834, Texas 62.0% 3.6% (+58.4)#1 3.5% (+58.5)#26
27. 38623, Mississippi 60.8% 3.6% (+57.2)#2 3.5% (+57.3)#27
28. 78352, Texas 59.7% 3.6% (+56.1)#2 3.5% (+56.2)#28
29. 92389, California 59.1% 3.7% (+55.4)#4 3.5% (+55.6)#29
30. 28708, North Carolina 58.5% 3.5% (+55.0)#1 3.5% (+55.1)#30
31. 69331, Nebraska 58.3% 3.0% (+55.3)#1 3.5% (+54.9)#31
32. 87530, New Mexico 58.0% 3.9% (+54.2)#1 3.5% (+54.5)#32
33. 40840, Kentucky 57.6% 3.3% (+54.3)#4 3.5% (+54.2)#33
34. 18454, Pennsylvania 57.1% 3.1% (+54.0)#2 3.5% (+53.7)#34
35. 78142, Texas 57.1% 3.6% (+53.6)#3 3.5% (+53.7)#35
36. 18340, Pennsylvania 55.6% 3.1% (+52.4)#3 3.5% (+52.1)#36
37. 41397, Kentucky 55.1% 3.3% (+51.7)#5 3.5% (+51.6)#37
38. 59856, Montana 54.2% 3.8% (+50.4)#2 3.5% (+50.7)#38
39. 83446, Idaho 53.8% 3.5% (+50.3)#1 3.5% (+50.4)#39
40. 34141, Florida 53.3% 4.4% (+48.9)#2 3.5% (+49.9)#40
41. 62843, Illinois 52.6% 3.2% (+49.4)#1 3.5% (+49.1)#41
42. 12998, New York 51.9% 3.6% (+48.3)#2 3.5% (+48.4)#42
43. 75903, Texas 51.5% 3.6% (+47.9)#4 3.5% (+48.0)#43
44. 31333, Georgia 51.2% 3.4% (+47.9)#2 3.5% (+47.7)#44
45. 14166, New York 50.0% 3.6% (+46.4)#3 3.5% (+46.5)#45
46. 93260, California 50.0% 3.7% (+46.3)#5 3.5% (+46.5)#46
47. 28424, North Carolina 50.0% 3.5% (+46.5)#2 3.5% (+46.5)#47
48. 99745, Alaska 50.0% 3.7% (+46.3)#1 3.5% (+46.5)#48
49. 21715, Maryland 50.0% 3.2% (+46.8)#1 3.5% (+46.5)#49
50. 27877, North Carolina 50.0% 3.5% (+46.5)#3 3.5% (+46.5)#50
51. 26376, West Virginia 49.3% 3.7% (+45.6)#3 3.5% (+45.8)#51
52. 49074, Michigan 49.1% 3.4% (+45.7)#2 3.5% (+45.6)#52
53. 92332, California 48.9% 3.7% (+45.2)#6 3.5% (+45.4)#53
54. 84024, Utah 48.7% 3.2% (+45.5)#1 3.5% (+45.2)#54
55. 48816, Michigan 48.4% 3.4% (+45.0)#3 3.5% (+44.9)#55
56. 36473, Alabama 48.2% 3.5% (+44.7)#1 3.5% (+44.7)#56
57. 13784, New York 47.9% 3.6% (+44.3)#4 3.5% (+44.4)#57
58. 19316, Pennsylvania 47.9% 3.1% (+44.8)#4 3.5% (+44.4)#58
59. 12489, New York 47.6% 3.6% (+44.0)#5 3.5% (+44.1)#59
60. 82638, Wyoming 47.1% 3.7% (+43.4)#1 3.5% (+43.6)#60
61. 85633, Arizona 47.1% 3.9% (+43.1)#2 3.5% (+43.6)#61
62. 28628, North Carolina 47.1% 3.5% (+43.6)#4 3.5% (+43.6)#62
63. 61059, Illinois 47.0% 3.2% (+43.8)#2 3.5% (+43.5)#63
64. 29934, South Carolina 46.3% 3.9% (+42.4)#1 3.5% (+42.8)#64
65. 94964, California 46.2% 3.7% (+42.5)#7 3.5% (+42.8)#65
66. 29378, South Carolina 44.9% 3.9% (+41.0)#2 3.5% (+41.4)#66
67. 13861, New York 44.6% 3.6% (+41.0)#6 3.5% (+41.1)#67
68. 26662, West Virginia 44.5% 3.7% (+40.8)#4 3.5% (+41.0)#68
69. 84728, Utah 44.2% 3.2% (+41.0)#2 3.5% (+40.7)#69
70. 22731, Virginia 43.8% 3.1% (+40.7)#3 3.5% (+40.3)#70
71. 43111, Ohio 43.5% 3.2% (+40.3)#2 3.5% (+40.0)#71
72. 56711, Minnesota 43.1% 3.0% (+40.1)#2 3.5% (+39.6)#72
73. 02873, Rhode Island 42.9% 3.4% (+39.4)#1 3.5% (+39.4)#73
74. 73571, Oklahoma 42.9% 3.6% (+39.2)#2 3.5% (+39.4)#74
75. 25942, West Virginia 42.3% 3.7% (+38.6)#5 3.5% (+38.8)#75
76. 77376, Texas 42.0% 3.6% (+38.5)#5 3.5% (+38.6)#76
77. 19733, Delaware 41.9% 4.0% (+37.9)#1 3.5% (+38.4)#77
78. 12724, New York 41.9% 3.6% (+38.2)#7 3.5% (+38.4)#78
79. 65246, Missouri 41.7% 3.2% (+38.5)#1 3.5% (+38.2)#79
80. 49335, Michigan 41.3% 3.4% (+37.9)#4 3.5% (+37.8)#80
81. 59756, Montana 40.9% 3.8% (+37.1)#3 3.5% (+37.4)#81
82. 72005, Arkansas 40.9% 3.7% (+37.2)#1 3.5% (+37.4)#82
83. 41606, Kentucky 40.7% 3.3% (+37.4)#6 3.5% (+37.3)#83
84. 79832, Texas 40.7% 3.6% (+37.2)#6 3.5% (+37.3)#84
85. 97904, Oregon 40.6% 3.2% (+37.4)#1 3.5% (+37.1)#85
86. 79220, Texas 40.3% 3.6% (+36.8)#7 3.5% (+36.9)#86
87. 81612, Colorado 40.2% 2.9% (+37.3)#2 3.5% (+36.7)#87
88. 51520, Iowa 40.0% 3.1% (+36.9)#1 3.5% (+36.5)#88
89. 26327, West Virginia 40.0% 3.7% (+36.3)#6 3.5% (+36.5)#89
90. 83812, Idaho 40.0% 3.5% (+36.5)#2 3.5% (+36.5)#90
91. 72352, Arkansas 40.0% 3.7% (+36.3)#2 3.5% (+36.5)#91
92. 13103, New York 39.8% 3.6% (+36.2)#8 3.5% (+36.3)#92
93. 88134, New Mexico 39.4% 3.9% (+35.5)#2 3.5% (+35.9)#93
94. 67627, Kansas 39.3% 3.3% (+36.1)#1 3.5% (+35.8)#94
95. 59343, Montana 39.3% 3.8% (+35.5)#4 3.5% (+35.8)#95
96. 28649, North Carolina 39.0% 3.5% (+35.5)#5 3.5% (+35.6)#96
97. 71279, Louisiana 39.0% 3.7% (+35.3)#2 3.5% (+35.5)#97
98. 91980, California 38.9% 3.7% (+35.2)#8 3.5% (+35.4)#98
99. 45147, Ohio 38.6% 3.2% (+35.4)#3 3.5% (+35.2)#99
100. 25036, West Virginia 38.6% 3.7% (+34.8)#7 3.5% (+35.1)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States?
30454 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States is 3.5%.