Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the United States

30.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 25672, West Virginia 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#1 0.44% (+99.6)#1
2. 40820, Kentucky 100.0% 0.53% (+99.5)#1 0.44% (+99.6)#2
3. 25913, West Virginia 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#2 0.44% (+99.6)#3
4. 43902, Ohio 100.0% 0.21% (+99.8)#1 0.44% (+99.6)#4
5. 70391, Louisiana 100.0% 2.4% (+97.6)#1 0.44% (+99.6)#5
6. 25650, West Virginia 100.0% 2.6% (+97.4)#3 0.44% (+99.6)#6
7. 89409, Nevada 100.0% 0.96% (+99.0)#1 0.44% (+99.6)#7
8. 83469, Idaho 100.0% 0.37% (+99.6)#1 0.44% (+99.6)#8
9. 82332, Wyoming 100.0% 6.4% (+93.6)#1 0.44% (+99.6)#9
10. 99679, Alaska 93.2% 3.1% (+90.1)#1 0.44% (+92.8)#10
11. 79330, Texas 83.7% 1.9% (+81.8)#1 0.44% (+83.2)#11
12. 24834, West Virginia 75.2% 2.6% (+72.6)#4 0.44% (+74.8)#12
13. 25025, West Virginia 70.6% 2.6% (+68.0)#5 0.44% (+70.1)#13
14. 25630, West Virginia 69.9% 2.6% (+67.3)#6 0.44% (+69.4)#14
15. 40808, Kentucky 69.2% 0.53% (+68.7)#2 0.44% (+68.8)#15
16. 70632, Louisiana 68.5% 2.4% (+66.1)#2 0.44% (+68.0)#16
17. 89045, Nevada 68.3% 0.96% (+67.4)#2 0.44% (+67.9)#17
18. 24879, West Virginia 66.7% 2.6% (+64.1)#7 0.44% (+66.2)#18
19. 76869, Texas 66.7% 1.9% (+64.8)#2 0.44% (+66.2)#19
20. 41604, Kentucky 65.1% 0.53% (+64.6)#3 0.44% (+64.7)#20
21. 41540, Kentucky 64.6% 0.53% (+64.0)#4 0.44% (+64.1)#21
22. 26325, West Virginia 64.3% 2.6% (+61.7)#8 0.44% (+63.8)#22
23. 86321, Arizona 64.2% 0.46% (+63.7)#1 0.44% (+63.7)#23
24. 76267, Texas 63.2% 1.9% (+61.3)#3 0.44% (+62.7)#24
25. 97905, Oregon 61.8% 0.080% (+61.7)#1 0.44% (+61.4)#25
26. 89319, Nevada 61.7% 0.96% (+60.7)#3 0.44% (+61.2)#26
27. 59217, Montana 61.1% 1.4% (+59.7)#1 0.44% (+60.7)#27
28. 26720, West Virginia 60.9% 2.6% (+58.3)#9 0.44% (+60.4)#28
29. 25932, West Virginia 60.4% 2.6% (+57.8)#10 0.44% (+60.0)#29
30. 73425, Oklahoma 60.0% 2.5% (+57.5)#1 0.44% (+59.6)#30
31. 26327, West Virginia 60.0% 2.6% (+57.4)#11 0.44% (+59.6)#31
32. 27821, North Carolina 60.0% 0.13% (+59.9)#1 0.44% (+59.6)#32
33. 89310, Nevada 57.9% 0.96% (+56.9)#4 0.44% (+57.5)#33
34. 99755, Alaska 57.3% 3.1% (+54.2)#2 0.44% (+56.9)#34
35. 24846, West Virginia 56.7% 2.6% (+54.1)#12 0.44% (+56.2)#35
36. 25108, West Virginia 56.0% 2.6% (+53.4)#13 0.44% (+55.6)#36
37. 73435, Oklahoma 56.0% 2.5% (+53.5)#2 0.44% (+55.6)#37
38. 25817, West Virginia 53.7% 2.6% (+51.1)#14 0.44% (+53.2)#38
39. 89821, Nevada 53.5% 0.96% (+52.5)#5 0.44% (+53.0)#39
40. 59211, Montana 53.2% 1.4% (+51.9)#2 0.44% (+52.8)#40
41. 65456, Missouri 52.9% 0.18% (+52.7)#1 0.44% (+52.4)#41
42. 89414, Nevada 52.0% 0.96% (+51.0)#6 0.44% (+51.6)#42
43. 16847, Pennsylvania 50.7% 0.36% (+50.3)#1 0.44% (+50.2)#43
44. 88038, New Mexico 50.0% 2.1% (+47.9)#1 0.44% (+49.6)#44
45. 96014, California 50.0% 0.12% (+49.9)#1 0.44% (+49.6)#45
46. 79781, Texas 50.0% 1.9% (+48.1)#4 0.44% (+49.6)#46
47. 73488, Oklahoma 50.0% 2.5% (+47.5)#3 0.44% (+49.6)#47
48. 88255, New Mexico 48.6% 2.1% (+46.5)#2 0.44% (+48.2)#48
49. 85540, Arizona 48.3% 0.46% (+47.9)#2 0.44% (+47.9)#49
50. 25149, West Virginia 48.0% 2.6% (+45.4)#15 0.44% (+47.6)#50
51. 79093, Texas 47.2% 1.9% (+45.4)#5 0.44% (+46.8)#51
52. 26136, West Virginia 47.0% 2.6% (+44.4)#16 0.44% (+46.6)#52
53. 87523, New Mexico 46.8% 2.1% (+44.7)#3 0.44% (+46.4)#53
54. 78116, Texas 46.4% 1.9% (+44.6)#6 0.44% (+46.0)#54
55. 25922, West Virginia 46.3% 2.6% (+43.7)#17 0.44% (+45.9)#55
56. 25048, West Virginia 45.5% 2.6% (+42.9)#18 0.44% (+45.0)#56
57. 76429, Texas 44.7% 1.9% (+42.8)#7 0.44% (+44.2)#57
58. 24815, West Virginia 43.2% 2.6% (+40.7)#19 0.44% (+42.8)#58
59. 82643, Wyoming 43.1% 6.4% (+36.8)#2 0.44% (+42.7)#59
60. 65557, Missouri 43.1% 0.18% (+42.9)#2 0.44% (+42.6)#60
61. 74034, Oklahoma 42.9% 2.5% (+40.3)#4 0.44% (+42.4)#61
62. 76481, Texas 42.3% 1.9% (+40.5)#8 0.44% (+41.9)#62
63. 58794, North Dakota 42.2% 3.0% (+39.2)#1 0.44% (+41.8)#63
64. 15440, Pennsylvania 41.4% 0.36% (+41.0)#2 0.44% (+40.9)#64
65. 25651, West Virginia 41.2% 2.6% (+38.6)#20 0.44% (+40.8)#65
66. 41534, Kentucky 40.7% 0.53% (+40.2)#5 0.44% (+40.3)#66
67. 78376, Texas 40.5% 1.9% (+38.7)#9 0.44% (+40.1)#67
68. 41712, Kentucky 40.1% 0.53% (+39.6)#6 0.44% (+39.7)#68
69. 99519, Alaska 40.1% 3.1% (+37.0)#3 0.44% (+39.6)#69
70. 26178, West Virginia 39.3% 2.6% (+36.7)#21 0.44% (+38.8)#70
71. 89047, Nevada 39.1% 0.96% (+38.1)#7 0.44% (+38.6)#71
72. 85135, Arizona 38.8% 0.46% (+38.4)#3 0.44% (+38.4)#72
73. 25267, West Virginia 38.8% 2.6% (+36.2)#22 0.44% (+38.3)#73
74. 99563, Alaska 38.7% 3.1% (+35.6)#4 0.44% (+38.2)#74
75. 41544, Kentucky 38.7% 0.53% (+38.1)#7 0.44% (+38.2)#75
76. 82322, Wyoming 38.6% 6.4% (+32.3)#3 0.44% (+38.2)#76
77. 26684, West Virginia 38.4% 2.6% (+35.8)#23 0.44% (+37.9)#77
78. 87499, New Mexico 37.9% 2.1% (+35.8)#4 0.44% (+37.5)#78
79. 24839, West Virginia 37.9% 2.6% (+35.3)#24 0.44% (+37.4)#79
80. 82620, Wyoming 37.8% 6.4% (+31.5)#4 0.44% (+37.4)#80
81. 24646, Virginia 37.5% 0.17% (+37.3)#1 0.44% (+37.1)#81
82. 78012, Texas 36.8% 1.9% (+35.0)#10 0.44% (+36.4)#82
83. 76932, Texas 36.8% 1.9% (+34.9)#11 0.44% (+36.3)#83
84. 73729, Oklahoma 36.5% 2.5% (+34.0)#5 0.44% (+36.1)#84
85. 99734, Alaska 36.2% 3.1% (+33.2)#5 0.44% (+35.8)#85
86. 25666, West Virginia 35.9% 2.6% (+33.4)#25 0.44% (+35.5)#86
87. 74866, Oklahoma 35.7% 2.5% (+33.2)#6 0.44% (+35.3)#87
88. 40863, Kentucky 35.5% 0.53% (+35.0)#8 0.44% (+35.1)#88
89. 41250, Kentucky 35.4% 0.53% (+34.9)#9 0.44% (+35.0)#89
90. 25511, West Virginia 35.4% 2.6% (+32.8)#26 0.44% (+34.9)#90
91. 82725, Wyoming 35.3% 6.4% (+28.9)#5 0.44% (+34.9)#91
92. 76958, Texas 35.0% 1.9% (+33.1)#12 0.44% (+34.6)#92
93. 73860, Oklahoma 34.6% 2.5% (+32.1)#7 0.44% (+34.2)#93
94. 15460, Pennsylvania 34.6% 0.36% (+34.3)#3 0.44% (+34.2)#94
95. 73440, Oklahoma 34.3% 2.5% (+31.8)#8 0.44% (+33.9)#95
96. 58655, North Dakota 34.0% 3.0% (+31.0)#2 0.44% (+33.5)#96
97. 82732, Wyoming 33.7% 6.4% (+27.4)#6 0.44% (+33.3)#97
98. 83111, Wyoming 33.7% 6.4% (+27.4)#7 0.44% (+33.3)#98
99. 70537, Louisiana 33.3% 2.4% (+31.0)#3 0.44% (+32.9)#99
100. 42047, Kentucky 33.3% 0.53% (+32.8)#10 0.44% (+32.9)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
93.2%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the United States?
25672 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction in the United States is 0.44%.