Ute vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,716,094 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.703% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 702.8 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.2%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $41,958, a difference of 14.5%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $82,070, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $54,958, a difference of 3.8%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $51,596, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $53,911, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 32.8%), single female poverty (28.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 31.2%), and male poverty (16.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.1%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 43.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.1%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.66%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and family households (64.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 96.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 96.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 13.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.1%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.7%), and master's degree (11.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.8% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.14%), college, 1 year or more (53.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.0% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 27.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.9%).