Ute vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,791,152 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 29.7 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $117,750, a difference of 40.3%), median household income ($72,402 compared to $100,151, a difference of 38.3%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $119,800, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $57,078, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $43,648, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 76.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 71.9%), and male poverty (16.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 22.2%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 23.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 49.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.2%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.2%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.6%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.25, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 33.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 46.7%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 38.1%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.2%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.3%).