Ute vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Yakama

Fair
Poor
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 7,666,979 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.723% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 722.5 Yakama.
Ute Integration in Yakama Communities

Ute vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 17.0%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $33,009, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $45,002, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($72,402 compared to $72,225, a difference of 0.25%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $86,992, a difference of 3.6%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $83,932, a difference of 4.4%).
Ute vs Yakama Income
Income MetricUteYakama
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
23.7%

Ute vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 45.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 41.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.23%), single female poverty (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Ute vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricUteYakama
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
21.4%

Ute vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 170.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 72.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Ute vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteYakama
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
8.1%

Ute vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 0.54%).
Ute vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
80.6%

Ute vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.3%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 22.2%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.9% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.45, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Ute vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteYakama
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
40.3%

Ute vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 75.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 47.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 36.7%).
Ute vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteYakama
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
12.9%

Ute vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 57.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 57.0%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Ute vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricUteYakama
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.3%

Ute vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.8%), male disability (11.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Ute vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricUteYakama
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%