Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Norway
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Immigrants from Norway

Fair
Good
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Norway Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,750,718 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 3.7 Immigrants from Norway.
Ute Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities

Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $52,217, a difference of 42.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $111,669, a difference of 33.0%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $115,847, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $50,984, a difference of 2.0%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $42,837, a difference of 22.5%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Income
Income MetricUteImmigrants from Norway
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$52,217
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Exceptional
$115,847
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Exceptional
$94,846
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Exceptional
$51,758
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Exceptional
$61,628
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Exceptional
$42,837
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$50,984
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Exceptional
$106,629
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Exceptional
$111,669
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Exceptional
$66,118
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
27.3%

Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 51.9%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 49.0%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.0%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.0%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty
Poverty MetricUteImmigrants from Norway
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.0%

Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteImmigrants from Norway
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.3%

Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteImmigrants from Norway
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Poor
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Poor
35.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Fair
82.5%

Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.1%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.6%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.14, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.6%), married-couple households (44.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 7.6%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteImmigrants from Norway
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Exceptional
29.9%

Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 43.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.010%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.0%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteImmigrants from Norway
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Poor
19.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Fair
6.1%

Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 60.6%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 49.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Education Level
Education Level MetricUteImmigrants from Norway
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
64.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
52.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
44.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
18.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.4%

Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 46.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Norway Disability
Disability MetricUteImmigrants from Norway
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Average
11.3%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%