Ute vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Hawaiians

Fair
Fair
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hawaiian Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,095,703 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 43.1 Hawaiians.
Ute Integration in Hawaiian Communities

Ute vs Hawaiian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $64,920, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $98,778, a difference of 17.7%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $84,729, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $50,488, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $53,078, a difference of 6.2%), and median earnings ($41,051 compared to $43,673, a difference of 6.4%).
Ute vs Hawaiian Income
Income MetricUteHawaiian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$39,403
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Poor
$98,869
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Average
$84,729
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Tragic
$43,673
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$50,488
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$37,497
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Excellent
$53,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Poor
$90,722
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Fair
$98,778
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Exceptional
$64,920
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Excellent
24.9%

Ute vs Hawaiian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 35.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.4%).
Ute vs Hawaiian Poverty
Poverty MetricUteHawaiian
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Average
9.0%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Fair
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
12.9%

Ute vs Hawaiian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 36.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.3%).
Ute vs Hawaiian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteHawaiian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.5%

Ute vs Hawaiian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Ute vs Hawaiian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteHawaiian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
81.5%

Ute vs Hawaiian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.41, a difference of 2.4%).
Ute vs Hawaiian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteHawaiian
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Poor
33.2%

Ute vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 44.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.8%).
Ute vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteHawaiian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
92.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
60.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
24.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
8.9%

Ute vs Hawaiian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.8%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and 6th grade (97.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
Ute vs Hawaiian Education Level
Education Level MetricUteHawaiian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
62.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
40.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Ute vs Hawaiian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.5%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Ute vs Hawaiian Disability
Disability MetricUteHawaiian
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%