Ute vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,230,388 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.998. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.273% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 273.1 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $62,330, a difference of 17.7%), median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $37,905, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $90,951, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $49,748, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $51,713, a difference of 3.4%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $76,383, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.0%), poverty (16.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.10%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and single male poverty (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 71.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 61.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.12%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 21.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 14.3%), single father households (3.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.27, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (44.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 34.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 68.5%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%).