Ute vs Estonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,262,771 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.969. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 33.9 Estonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $51,875, a difference of 41.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $114,220, a difference of 36.1%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $118,013, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $51,523, a difference of 3.0%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $43,106, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 60.6%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 60.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.9%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and single male poverty (15.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.1%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.3%), married-couple households (44.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 37.7%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 60.3%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 79.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%).