Ute vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Scandinavians

Fair
Good
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scandinavian Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,998,308 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.268% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 267.7 Scandinavians.
Ute Integration in Scandinavian Communities

Ute vs Scandinavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $102,969, a difference of 22.7%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $43,848, a difference of 19.6%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $104,410, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $52,654, a difference of 5.3%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $38,306, a difference of 9.6%).
Ute vs Scandinavian Income
Income MetricUteScandinavian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Average
$43,848
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Good
$104,410
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Good
$86,073
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Average
$46,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Good
$55,527
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$38,306
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Good
$52,654
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Good
$95,596
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Good
$102,969
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Good
$61,586
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
29.1%

Ute vs Scandinavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 60.5%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 58.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.7%), single male poverty (15.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 23.4%).
Ute vs Scandinavian Poverty
Poverty MetricUteScandinavian
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Fair
20.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.7%

Ute vs Scandinavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 54.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 43.2%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.9%).
Ute vs Scandinavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteScandinavian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%

Ute vs Scandinavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Ute vs Scandinavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteScandinavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Good
83.0%

Ute vs Scandinavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.5%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.61%), family households (64.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Ute vs Scandinavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteScandinavian
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Exceptional
29.8%

Ute vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 65.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 4.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.7%).
Ute vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteScandinavian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
7.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
93.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
62.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
8.0%

Ute vs Scandinavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.7%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
Ute vs Scandinavian Education Level
Education Level MetricUteScandinavian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
67.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
1.8%

Ute vs Scandinavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 79.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Ute vs Scandinavian Disability
Disability MetricUteScandinavian
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%