Ute vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,731,054 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.977. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.763% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 763.2 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $34,584, a difference of 44.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $60,305, a difference of 36.2%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $54,644, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $32,500, a difference of 7.6%), median earnings ($41,051 compared to $36,876, a difference of 11.3%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $41,715, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 60.4%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 55.9%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (28.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 16.2%), single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 112.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 97.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 19.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 46.0%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.1%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.53%), family households (64.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.33%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 85.0%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 63.3%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.8% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 59.9%), disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 56.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.6%).