Ute vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Romanians

Fair
Excellent
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,751,915 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.760. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.306% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 306.4 Romanians.
Ute Integration in Romanian Communities

Ute vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $48,445, a difference of 32.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $108,609, a difference of 29.4%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $91,994, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.65%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $53,632, a difference of 7.3%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $41,663, a difference of 19.2%).
Ute vs Romanian Income
Income MetricUteRomanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
28.0%

Ute vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 55.4%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 47.8%), and poverty (16.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.7%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.7%).
Ute vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricUteRomanian
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.4%

Ute vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.1%).
Ute vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteRomanian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%

Ute vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 5.0%).
Ute vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Good
83.0%

Ute vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.6%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.5%).
Ute vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteRomanian
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Exceptional
28.7%

Ute vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.52%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.0%).
Ute vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Fair
6.2%

Ute vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 46.5%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 34.6%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Ute vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricUteRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%

Ute vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 48.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.39%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Ute vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricUteRomanian
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Good
2.4%