Ute vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Potawatomi

Fair
Fair
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Potawatomi Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,555,258 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 24.0 Potawatomi.
Ute Integration in Potawatomi Communities

Ute vs Potawatomi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $46,462, a difference of 7.6%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $38,046, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $54,212, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.20%), median household income ($72,402 compared to $72,576, a difference of 0.24%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $48,768, a difference of 0.27%).
Ute vs Potawatomi Income
Income MetricUtePotawatomi
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$38,046
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Tragic
$88,265
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Tragic
$72,576
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Tragic
$41,288
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$48,768
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$34,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$46,462
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$81,774
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Tragic
$84,613
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Tragic
$54,212
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
27.7%

Ute vs Potawatomi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.8%), poverty (16.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.57%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Ute vs Potawatomi Poverty
Poverty MetricUtePotawatomi
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
23.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
16.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
21.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
15.8%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
34.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Poor
12.5%

Ute vs Potawatomi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 47.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.5%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Ute vs Potawatomi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUtePotawatomi
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Ute vs Potawatomi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Ute vs Potawatomi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUtePotawatomi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
62.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Tragic
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
80.0%

Ute vs Potawatomi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.5%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.16, a difference of 10.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (44.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.8%).
Ute vs Potawatomi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUtePotawatomi
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
36.2%

Ute vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Ute vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUtePotawatomi
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
8.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.3%

Ute vs Potawatomi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
Ute vs Potawatomi Education Level
Education Level MetricUtePotawatomi
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Average
89.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
61.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
54.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
40.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.6%

Ute vs Potawatomi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 58.7%), male disability (11.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 7.2%).
Ute vs Potawatomi Disability
Disability MetricUtePotawatomi
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%