Ute vs Swiss Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swiss
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Swiss

Fair
Good
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swiss Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,509,958 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.467. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 43.7 Swiss.
Ute Integration in Swiss Communities

Ute vs Swiss Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $103,071, a difference of 22.8%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $44,076, a difference of 20.3%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $104,396, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $51,493, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $37,904, a difference of 8.4%).
Ute vs Swiss Income
Income MetricUteSwiss
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Good
$44,076
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Good
$104,396
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Average
$85,681
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Average
$46,315
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Good
$55,731
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$37,904
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Poor
$51,493
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Good
$95,511
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Good
$103,071
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Good
$61,621
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
30.0%

Ute vs Swiss Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 59.5%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 56.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.2%), single male poverty (15.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 20.2%).
Ute vs Swiss Poverty
Poverty MetricUteSwiss
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Fair
21.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.7%

Ute vs Swiss Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 52.2%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 40.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.7%).
Ute vs Swiss Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteSwiss
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Ute vs Swiss Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Ute vs Swiss Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteSwiss
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
43.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Average
82.8%

Ute vs Swiss Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.1%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
Ute vs Swiss Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteSwiss
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
49.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
49.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Excellent
30.5%

Ute vs Swiss Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
Ute vs Swiss Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteSwiss
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
61.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.8%

Ute vs Swiss Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.9%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
Ute vs Swiss Education Level
Education Level MetricUteSwiss
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Average
65.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Fair
37.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
2.0%

Ute vs Swiss Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 89.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Ute vs Swiss Disability
Disability MetricUteSwiss
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%