Colville vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Colville
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Colville
Ecuadorians
1,752
SOCIAL INDEX
15.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
289th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Colville Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,028,990 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Colville communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Colville within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.353% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Colville corresponds to a decrease of 353.5 Ecuadorians.
Colville vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Colville and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,094 compared to $82,070, a difference of 17.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,474 compared to $93,739, a difference of 13.7%), and median family income ($85,792 compared to $95,114, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,514 compared to $39,117, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($51,739 compared to $54,958, a difference of 6.2%), and median male earnings ($48,516 compared to $51,596, a difference of 6.4%).
Income Metric | Colville | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,047 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,792 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,094 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,151 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,516 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,514 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,774 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,604 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,474 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,739 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.3% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Colville vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Colville and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 51.7%), single male poverty (18.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 47.5%), and single female poverty (29.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Poverty Metric | Colville | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Tragic 16.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 24.1% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 18.4% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 29.1% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 21.4% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 39.3% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 14.9% |
Colville vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Colville and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (29.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 44.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Colville | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 11.2% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Colville vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Colville and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Colville | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.8% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.8% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.9% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.7% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.5% | Tragic 82.3% |
Colville vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Colville and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.1%), births to unmarried women (45.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (63.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Colville | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.0% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.3% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.4% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 45.3% | Poor 33.3% |
Colville vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Colville and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 149.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 83.3%), and no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.8% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 11.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 32.5%), and no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 66.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Colville | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.8% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 25.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Colville vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Colville and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 52.8%), bachelor's degree (29.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Colville | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.4% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Colville vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Colville and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 200.3%), hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 113.1%), and male disability (16.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age over 75 (55.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 16.9%).
Disability Metric | Colville | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.5% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.4% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.6% |