Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Immigrants from South Central Asia

Fair
Exceptional
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,849,565 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Ute Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities

Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $124,188, a difference of 47.9%), median household income ($72,402 compared to $106,057, a difference of 46.5%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $125,956, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $57,818, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $70,103, a difference of 32.4%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
Income MetricUteImmigrants from South Central Asia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$52,660
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Exceptional
$125,956
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Exceptional
$106,057
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Exceptional
$57,114
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Exceptional
$68,960
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Exceptional
$46,324
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Exceptional
$57,818
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Exceptional
$116,626
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Exceptional
$124,188
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Exceptional
$70,103
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
29.3%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 77.6%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 75.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.9%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.6%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
Poverty MetricUteImmigrants from South Central Asia
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
9.3%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
17.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
13.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
25.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
8.8%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 44.5%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.5%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteImmigrants from South Central Asia
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
16.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.9%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteImmigrants from South Central Asia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
74.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Exceptional
84.0%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 50.7%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 33.7%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.23, a difference of 8.1%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteImmigrants from South Central Asia
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Exceptional
66.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
30.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
50.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Exceptional
24.7%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 43.1%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 35.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.2%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteImmigrants from South Central Asia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
91.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Fair
6.1%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 76.8%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 56.4%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
Education Level MetricUteImmigrants from South Central Asia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Good
97.5%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
72.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
55.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
48.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
20.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.6%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 51.0%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.6%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 14.3%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
Disability MetricUteImmigrants from South Central Asia
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
8.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%