Ute vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,052,089 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.466. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.061% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 61.2 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $53,154, a difference of 45.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $116,328, a difference of 38.6%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $120,487, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.80%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $54,389, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $44,169, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Russian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 64.8%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 61.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.7%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.5%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Russian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 66.8%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 57.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 58.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 31.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%).