Ute vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Sub-Saharan Africans

Fair
Tragic
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Subsaharan African Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,841,201 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 53.6 Sub-Saharan Africans.
Ute Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

Ute vs Subsaharan African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 21.7%), median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $38,391, a difference of 9.8%), and per capita income ($36,651 compared to $40,152, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $84,235, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $48,691, a difference of 2.7%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $50,408, a difference of 3.1%).
Ute vs Subsaharan African Income
Income MetricUteSubsaharan African
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$40,152
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Tragic
$93,748
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Tragic
$77,631
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Tragic
$44,118
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$50,408
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$38,391
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$48,691
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$84,235
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Tragic
$90,691
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Tragic
$56,615
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
22.8%

Ute vs Subsaharan African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 22.5%), single female poverty (28.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and poverty (16.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.74%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Ute vs Subsaharan African Poverty
Poverty MetricUteSubsaharan African
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
20.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
20.1%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.7%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
23.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
31.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.1%

Ute vs Subsaharan African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Ute vs Subsaharan African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteSubsaharan African
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
11.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.2%

Ute vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
Ute vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteSubsaharan African
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
75.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
82.0%

Ute vs Subsaharan African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.3%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Ute vs Subsaharan African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteSubsaharan African
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
41.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
36.7%

Ute vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 53.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.95%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 9.0%).
Ute vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteSubsaharan African
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
51.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
17.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Ute vs Subsaharan African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 21.5%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.37%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.45%).
Ute vs Subsaharan African Education Level
Education Level MetricUteSubsaharan African
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
84.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
63.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
57.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
43.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
35.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
1.8%

Ute vs Subsaharan African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 51.9%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.4%), male disability (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Ute vs Subsaharan African Disability
Disability MetricUteSubsaharan African
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%