Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Immigrants from Ghana

Fair
Poor
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,992,241 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.783% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 782.5 Immigrants from Ghana.
Ute Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 24.5%), median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $39,894, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $94,982, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $51,333, a difference of 2.7%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $51,836, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $87,760, a difference of 6.8%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Income
Income MetricUteImmigrants from Ghana
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$41,131
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Tragic
$96,544
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Tragic
$81,489
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Fair
$45,641
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$51,836
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Good
$39,894
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Poor
$51,333
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$87,760
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Tragic
$94,982
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Tragic
$58,624
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
22.3%

Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (28.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 29.6%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.7%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty
Poverty MetricUteImmigrants from Ghana
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
19.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.1%

Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteImmigrants from Ghana
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.2%

Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteImmigrants from Ghana
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Good
82.9%

Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.6%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteImmigrants from Ghana
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
42.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
34.5%

Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 69.2%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 43.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 40.3%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteImmigrants from Ghana
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
16.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
83.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
47.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
16.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.2%

Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 27.9%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.16%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.79%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level
Education Level MetricUteImmigrants from Ghana
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
89.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
87.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
63.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
57.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Poor
44.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Fair
36.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
1.8%

Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.5%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability
Disability MetricUteImmigrants from Ghana
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
24.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Poor
2.5%