Ute vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,046,097 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.482% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 482.1 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $54,264, a difference of 48.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $119,756, a difference of 45.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $122,178, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $57,931, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $69,174, a difference of 30.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 73.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 62.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 19.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 60.5%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.56%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.23, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 45.1%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 80.7%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 67.4%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.32%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 53.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 34.7%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 11.8%).