Slavic vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Slavic
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Slavs
Ecuadorians
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Slavic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,691,625 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.442% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 442.2 Ecuadorians.
Slavic vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $54,958, a difference of 12.3%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $95,114, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $39,117, a difference of 1.3%), median earnings ($47,470 compared to $45,214, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $91,574, a difference of 5.2%).
Income Metric | Slavic | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,049 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Good $105,144 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,398 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,470 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,390 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,613 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,563 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,377 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,629 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,709 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Slavic vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 43.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Poverty Metric | Slavic | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.0% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Average 21.1% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.4% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.9% |
Slavic vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Slavic | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Slavic vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.72%).
Labor Participation Metric | Slavic | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.6% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 82.3% |
Slavic vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.7%), currently married (48.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Slavic | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Poor 64.0% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Excellent 2.2% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.6% | Poor 33.3% |
Slavic vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 154.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 45.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Slavic | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.2% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Slavic vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 79.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.5%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Slavic | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.7% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.7% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.6% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.9% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Slavic vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.3%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Disability Metric | Slavic | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |