Ute vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,653,116 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 8.1 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $45,450, a difference of 10.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $78,168, a difference of 5.1%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $69,947, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $53,060, a difference of 0.21%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and per capita income ($36,651 compared to $35,999, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.9%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and poverty (16.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 51.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 41.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 11.7%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (64.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 39.4%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.7%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 117.6%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.3%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 10.5%).