Ute vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,536,708 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.914. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.452% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 452.3 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $45,663, a difference of 24.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $103,536, a difference of 23.4%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $106,183, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $50,379, a difference of 0.77%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $39,891, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 70.7%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 67.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.2%), single male poverty (15.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 46.4%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.8%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.10, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 116.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.3%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 31.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 53.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.6%), male disability (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.4%).