Ute vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,149,323 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.209% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 209.4 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $50,303, a difference of 37.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $111,430, a difference of 32.8%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $114,586, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $55,743, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $62,162, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 60.6%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 51.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.4%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 84.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 46.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 44.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 61.2%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 45.7%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 25.8%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.4%).