Ute vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Ghanaians

Fair
Fair
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,439,878 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.794% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 794.0 Ghanaians.
Ute Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Ute vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 24.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $97,277, a difference of 15.9%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $40,429, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $52,594, a difference of 5.2%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $52,810, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $90,137, a difference of 9.7%).
Ute vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricUteGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
22.3%

Ute vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (28.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 31.8%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.3%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 7.9%).
Ute vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricUteGhanaian
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.0%

Ute vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.98%).
Ute vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteGhanaian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.2%

Ute vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 4.9%).
Ute vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Good
83.0%

Ute vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.4%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.29, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Ute vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteGhanaian
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
34.3%

Ute vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 66.8%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 41.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 38.6%).
Ute vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.2%

Ute vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 32.5%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.1% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.42%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and 5th grade (97.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Ute vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricUteGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
1.8%

Ute vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.81%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Ute vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricUteGhanaian
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Average
2.5%