Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Ecuadorians
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,594,038 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Ecuadorians.
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $51,596, a difference of 33.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $93,739, a difference of 32.5%), and median family income ($125,956 compared to $95,114, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $53,911, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $39,117, a difference of 18.4%), and per capita income ($52,660 compared to $41,958, a difference of 25.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,660 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,956 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $106,057 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $57,114 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $68,960 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,324 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,818 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $116,626 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $124,188 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $70,103 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.3% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 68.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 52.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.7%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.4%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.6% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.8% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.3% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.0% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 34.8%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 8.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.0% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 50.0% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 165.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 34.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.5% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 80.2%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 50.5%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Good 97.5% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.1% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.7% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.7% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.0% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |