Ute vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,876,045 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 86.2 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $59,066, a difference of 61.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $134,910, a difference of 60.7%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $115,509, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $57,740, a difference of 15.5%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $49,508, a difference of 41.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 102.9%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 98.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 94.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.8%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 46.4%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 64.3%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 51.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (64.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.20, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 26.6%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 99.7%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 88.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 66.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 43.7%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 15.7%).