Ute vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

New Zealanders

Fair
Excellent
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,072,131 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 New Zealanders.
Ute Integration in New Zealander Communities

Ute vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $50,575, a difference of 38.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $111,286, a difference of 32.6%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $115,230, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.21%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $53,294, a difference of 6.6%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $42,446, a difference of 21.4%).
Ute vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricUteNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
27.7%

Ute vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 51.0%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 49.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.2%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.1%).
Ute vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricUteNew Zealander
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.9%

Ute vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.5%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.1%).
Ute vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteNew Zealander
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.3%

Ute vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Ute vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Fair
82.6%

Ute vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.7%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.15, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 6.2%).
Ute vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteNew Zealander
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Excellent
30.3%

Ute vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.9%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.17%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.3%).
Ute vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Good
6.5%

Ute vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 55.9%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Ute vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricUteNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.5%

Ute vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.56%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Ute vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricUteNew Zealander
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%