Ute vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,031,193 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 18.2 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $103,472, a difference of 23.3%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $45,047, a difference of 22.9%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $106,541, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $50,923, a difference of 1.8%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $55,290, a difference of 13.1%), and wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (28.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 36.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 33.7%), and male poverty (16.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 71.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 43.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.9%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 0.82%), married-couple households (44.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 53.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.18%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 46.2%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 32.1%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.1%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.25%), disability (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.1%).