Ute vs Slavic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Slavs

Fair
Good
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Slavic Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,589,268 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.104% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 104.2 Slavs.
Ute Integration in Slavic Communities

Ute vs Slavic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $45,049, a difference of 22.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $102,629, a difference of 22.3%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $105,144, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $50,563, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $39,613, a difference of 13.3%).
Ute vs Slavic Income
Income MetricUteSlavic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Excellent
$45,049
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Good
$105,144
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Good
$86,398
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Excellent
$47,470
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Excellent
$56,390
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Average
$39,613
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$50,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Good
$96,377
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Good
$102,629
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Good
$61,709
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Ute vs Slavic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 54.2%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 48.9%), and poverty (16.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and single male poverty (15.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.0%).
Ute vs Slavic Poverty
Poverty MetricUteSlavic
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.6%

Ute vs Slavic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 43.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.2%).
Ute vs Slavic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteSlavic
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.2%

Ute vs Slavic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 6.1%).
Ute vs Slavic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteSlavic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Good
82.9%

Ute vs Slavic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.7%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.1%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.13, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.56%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 4.4%).
Ute vs Slavic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteSlavic
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Average
31.6%

Ute vs Slavic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.4%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.1%).
Ute vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteSlavic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
91.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Ute vs Slavic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.0%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 32.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Ute vs Slavic Education Level
Education Level MetricUteSlavic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Excellent
66.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
1.9%

Ute vs Slavic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 63.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Ute vs Slavic Disability
Disability MetricUteSlavic
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Fair
2.5%