Scottish vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Scottish
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Scottish
Ecuadorians
6,834
SOCIAL INDEX
65.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
139th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Scottish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,692,387 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to a decrease of 15.9 Ecuadorians.
Scottish vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 27.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $54,958, a difference of 12.3%), and median family income ($104,288 compared to $95,114, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $39,117, a difference of 1.9%), median earnings ($46,463 compared to $45,214, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $91,574, a difference of 3.3%).
Income Metric | Scottish | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,440 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,288 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Average $85,101 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,463 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,793 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,397 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,554 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $94,622 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,123 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,735 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.1% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Scottish vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 52.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 52.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.88%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Poverty Metric | Scottish | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.0% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.8% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.1% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 14.9% |
Scottish vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.0%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Scottish | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Scottish vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 33.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.29%).
Labor Participation Metric | Scottish | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.9% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.0% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 82.3% |
Scottish vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.1%), currently married (49.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Scottish | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.2% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Scottish vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 236.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 66.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 19.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 45.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Scottish | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.4% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.2% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Scottish vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 109.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.9%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Scottish | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.0% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.4% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.7% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.0% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.5% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Good 46.9% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.1% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.2% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Scottish vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 50.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 48.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Disability Metric | Scottish | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |