Ute vs Israeli Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Israeli
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Israelis

Fair
Good
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,737
SOCIAL INDEX
64.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
145th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Israeli Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,852,681 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.091% in Israelis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 90.6 Israelis.
Ute Integration in Israeli Communities

Ute vs Israeli Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $52,596, a difference of 43.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $114,186, a difference of 36.0%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $118,577, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $52,335, a difference of 4.7%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $43,852, a difference of 25.4%).
Ute vs Israeli Income
Income MetricUteIsraeli
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$52,596
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Exceptional
$118,577
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Exceptional
$96,552
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Exceptional
$52,937
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Exceptional
$63,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Exceptional
$43,852
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Average
$52,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Exceptional
$107,579
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Exceptional
$114,186
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Exceptional
$66,636
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Ute vs Israeli Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (28.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 42.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 42.3%), and male poverty (16.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.9%).
Ute vs Israeli Poverty
Poverty MetricUteIsraeli
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Good
8.9%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Fair
11.5%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Average
13.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Excellent
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Excellent
15.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Average
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.7%

Ute vs Israeli Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Ute vs Israeli Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteIsraeli
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Poor
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
5.6%

Ute vs Israeli Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
Ute vs Israeli Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteIsraeli
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Tragic
32.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
72.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Fair
82.7%

Ute vs Israeli Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 50.2%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.0%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 5.0%).
Ute vs Israeli Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteIsraeli
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Exceptional
28.6%

Ute vs Israeli Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 67.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 35.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 1.2%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 9.1%).
Ute vs Israeli Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteIsraeli
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
87.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
51.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
16.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.2%

Ute vs Israeli Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 73.6%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 72.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
Ute vs Israeli Education Level
Education Level MetricUteIsraeli
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
93.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
90.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
65.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
53.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
20.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.7%

Ute vs Israeli Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.6%), disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Ute vs Israeli Disability
Disability MetricUteIsraeli
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
46.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Good
2.4%