Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Immigrants from Uganda

Fair
Good
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,088,458 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 3.0 Immigrants from Uganda.
Ute Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $103,584, a difference of 23.4%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $45,043, a difference of 22.9%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $106,188, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $52,374, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $56,064, a difference of 14.6%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Income
Income MetricUteImmigrants from Uganda
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Excellent
$45,043
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Excellent
$106,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Excellent
$87,553
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Exceptional
$48,041
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Excellent
$56,064
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Excellent
$40,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Good
$52,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Good
$95,698
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Excellent
$103,584
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Good
$61,976
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Excellent
24.9%

Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (28.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 39.8%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 37.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.7%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty
Poverty MetricUteImmigrants from Uganda
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Fair
17.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Excellent
20.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Average
11.9%

Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 52.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.6%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteImmigrants from Uganda
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.4%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteImmigrants from Uganda
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
39.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Exceptional
83.7%

Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.3%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.37%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and family households (64.3% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteImmigrants from Uganda
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
62.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Good
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Excellent
30.5%

Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 47.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 23.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.0%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteImmigrants from Uganda
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Good
10.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Fair
55.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.9%

Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 42.0%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 31.6%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and 8th grade (95.8% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level
Education Level MetricUteImmigrants from Uganda
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Average
85.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Excellent
66.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Excellent
60.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
40.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%

Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.6%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.9%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability
Disability MetricUteImmigrants from Uganda
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Average
11.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%