Ute vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,462,372 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.381. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.080% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 80.5 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $51,731, a difference of 41.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $114,342, a difference of 36.2%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $117,780, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $55,571, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $66,892, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 63.5%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 56.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.4%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 43.2%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 50.3%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (64.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 59.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.54%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 70.6%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 52.9%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 36.4%), disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.1%).