Ute vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,859,738 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.992. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.886% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 2,885.9 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.2%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $45,607, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $56,768, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,651 compared to $36,690, a difference of 0.10%), median family income ($87,596 compared to $87,387, a difference of 0.24%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $50,132, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and single female poverty (28.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 64.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 49.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in currently married (43.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.5%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.13%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 78.5%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.4%), and master's degree (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (86.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.18%), ged/equivalency (81.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 38.5%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.48%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%).