Ute vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,480,204 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 24.4 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 18.4%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $41,758, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $71,697, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($72,402 compared to $67,965, a difference of 6.5%), median family income ($87,596 compared to $82,064, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $75,945, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 39.9%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 29.6%), and male poverty (16.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 193.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 140.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 124.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 42.7%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.090%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 72.7%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.8%), and master's degree (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.2% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.8%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.9%).