Ute vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Malaysians

Fair
Fair
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,060,678 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 18.1 Malaysians.
Ute Integration in Malaysian Communities

Ute vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $94,517, a difference of 12.6%), median household income ($72,402 compared to $81,064, a difference of 12.0%), and wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $51,615, a difference of 3.2%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $50,772, a difference of 3.8%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $37,298, a difference of 6.7%).
Ute vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricUteMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Excellent
25.0%

Ute vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 35.5%), poverty (16.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and single female poverty (28.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 15.6%).
Ute vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricUteMalaysian
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
12.7%

Ute vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.6%).
Ute vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteMalaysian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.5%

Ute vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.4%).
Ute vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
82.0%

Ute vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.5%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.31, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (64.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Ute vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteMalaysian
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
33.9%

Ute vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 50.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.8%).
Ute vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.7%

Ute vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.4%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.22%), 11th grade (91.1% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and high school diploma (86.2% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.96%).
Ute vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricUteMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Ute vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 50.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), male disability (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Ute vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricUteMalaysian
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.5%