Ute vs Swedish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Swedes

Fair
Excellent
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swedish Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,423,101 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.063% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 63.4 Swedes.
Ute Integration in Swedish Communities

Ute vs Swedish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $106,377, a difference of 26.7%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $45,750, a difference of 24.8%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $108,499, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $52,986, a difference of 6.0%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $39,421, a difference of 12.8%).
Ute vs Swedish Income
Income MetricUteSwedish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$45,750
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Exceptional
$108,499
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Exceptional
$88,524
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Excellent
$47,851
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Exceptional
$57,445
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Fair
$39,421
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Excellent
$52,986
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Exceptional
$99,136
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Exceptional
$106,377
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Excellent
$62,736
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
29.4%

Ute vs Swedish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 69.3%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 68.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.6%), single male poverty (15.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 25.7%).
Ute vs Swedish Poverty
Poverty MetricUteSwedish
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Excellent
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.2%

Ute vs Swedish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 54.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.8%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.1%).
Ute vs Swedish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteSwedish
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%

Ute vs Swedish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 6.9%).
Ute vs Swedish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteSwedish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
44.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Exceptional
83.7%

Ute vs Swedish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.3%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.8%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Ute vs Swedish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteSwedish
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
49.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Exceptional
29.6%

Ute vs Swedish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 70.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 9.3%).
Ute vs Swedish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteSwedish
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
61.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.6%

Ute vs Swedish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 60.7%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.48%).
Ute vs Swedish Education Level
Education Level MetricUteSwedish
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
94.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
93.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
92.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Good
39.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
2.0%

Ute vs Swedish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 83.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.37%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Ute vs Swedish Disability
Disability MetricUteSwedish
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%