Ute vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,454,290 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.997. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.163% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 163.0 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $45,371, a difference of 10.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $74,847, a difference of 9.8%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $67,715, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $51,949, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and per capita income ($36,651 compared to $35,546, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Creek communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 37.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.0%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.28%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 49.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 49.6%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.9%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 91.2%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 41.6%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 10.6%).