Ute vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,289,876 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.897. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 19.8 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 32.6%), median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $39,910, a difference of 14.2%), and per capita income ($36,651 compared to $41,709, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $55,394, a difference of 4.6%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $51,642, a difference of 5.6%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $94,665, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (28.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 27.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 22.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty (17.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.52%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.0%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.59%), family households (64.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 124.6%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 122.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 19.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 45.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 81.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 39.2%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 32.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (86.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.0% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 0.93%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.1%).