Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Immigrants from Middle Africa

Fair
Fair
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,498,362 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.764. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 23.1 Immigrants from Middle Africa.
Ute Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities

Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 24.2%), householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $58,375, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $91,293, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $82,254, a difference of 0.11%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $49,201, a difference of 0.62%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $47,916, a difference of 4.3%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income
Income MetricUteImmigrants from Middle Africa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$39,529
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Tragic
$93,593
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Tragic
$77,559
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Tragic
$43,416
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$49,201
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$37,965
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$47,916
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$82,254
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Tragic
$91,293
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Tragic
$58,375
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
22.4%

Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 27.7%), single female poverty (28.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and single male poverty (15.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.2%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty
Poverty MetricUteImmigrants from Middle Africa
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
12.9%

Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.9%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteImmigrants from Middle Africa
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%

Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.9%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteImmigrants from Middle Africa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
67.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Exceptional
83.3%

Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.0%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.25, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.11%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteImmigrants from Middle Africa
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
43.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
34.9%

Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 51.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.0%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteImmigrants from Middle Africa
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Good
89.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
53.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.8%

Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 24.5%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.55%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.60%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level
Education Level MetricUteImmigrants from Middle Africa
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
94.2%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
92.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Poor
58.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Poor
44.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Fair
36.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
1.9%

Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.7%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.62%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability
Disability MetricUteImmigrants from Middle Africa
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Good
11.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%