Ute vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,261,246 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.940. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.089% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 88.6 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $52,074, a difference of 42.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $113,533, a difference of 35.3%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $118,440, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $53,739, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $43,308, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Australian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 56.0%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 54.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.7%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 42.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.6%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.1%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.6%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.17%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Australian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 57.0%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 46.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 60.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.7%).