Ute vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,296,251 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.535. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.168% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 168.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $128,140, a difference of 55.9%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $56,709, a difference of 54.7%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $111,519, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 8.8%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $62,083, a difference of 24.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $71,567, a difference of 35.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 89.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 77.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 76.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.66%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 29.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 39.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 61.7%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 46.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (64.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.26, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 74.5%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 59.4%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.40%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 63.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 37.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 10.0%).