Ute vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Lithuanians

Fair
Excellent
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,530,787 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.978. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.263% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 2,262.6 Lithuanians.
Ute Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Ute vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $49,448, a difference of 34.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $112,484, a difference of 34.0%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $115,395, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $53,552, a difference of 7.1%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $42,108, a difference of 20.4%).
Ute vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricUteLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
28.7%

Ute vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 70.2%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 67.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.1%), single male poverty (15.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 22.2%).
Ute vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricUteLithuanian
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.7%

Ute vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.7%).
Ute vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteLithuanian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Ute vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 6.5%).
Ute vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Exceptional
83.6%

Ute vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.3%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.10, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.46%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.8%).
Ute vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteLithuanian
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Exceptional
29.6%

Ute vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.4%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 37.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.6%).
Ute vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Average
6.3%

Ute vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 57.3%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 51.4%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%).
Ute vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricUteLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.3%

Ute vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 81.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.48%).
Ute vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricUteLithuanian
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%