Ute vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,179,586 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 10.1 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 10.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $86,595, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $48,603, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $81,531, a difference of 0.78%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $48,402, a difference of 1.0%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $88,717, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 16.0%), single female poverty (28.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and poverty (16.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.050%), single male poverty (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 14.9%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.24, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 0.64%), family households (64.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.9%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 0.37%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.0%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 91.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.7%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.1%).