Czech vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Creek

Excellent
Fair
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,223,548 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 20.4 Creek.
Czech Integration in Creek Communities

Czech vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $78,960, a difference of 31.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $74,847, a difference of 29.0%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $82,560, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $45,371, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $33,437, a difference of 16.6%).
Czech vs Creek Income
Income MetricCzechCreek
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
27.1%

Czech vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 56.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.6%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 18.7%).
Czech vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechCreek
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.1%

Czech vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
Czech vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechCreek
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%

Czech vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 6.4%).
Czech vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
77.7%

Czech vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.4%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 23.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.46%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.9%).
Czech vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechCreek
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
37.6%

Czech vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Czech vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechCreek
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.2%

Czech vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 41.3%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 40.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
Czech vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechCreek
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Czech vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 49.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.7%).
Czech vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricCzechCreek
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%