Ute vs Creek Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Creek
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Ute
Creek
15.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Creek Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,243,903 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,159,894 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 7.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Creek |
| Minimum | 11.8% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 88.2% | 96.0% |
| Mean | 45.2% | 25.8% |
| Median | 37.4% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.9% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.8% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 42.9% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.5% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.4% | 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Creek by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Potawatomi (15.8%, a difference of 0.57%), American (15.8%, a difference of 0.73%), Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 0.75%), Blackfeet (15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |