Menominee vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Menominee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavian
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBelarusBelgiumBelizeBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemen
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Menominee

Creek

Fair
Fair
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Menominee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,775,313 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Menominee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Menominee corresponds to a decrease of 16.6 Creek.
Menominee Integration in Creek Communities

Menominee vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Menominee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 19.4%), median male earnings ($42,581 compared to $46,594, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,358 compared to $74,847, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,719 compared to $51,949, a difference of 0.45%), median household income ($68,423 compared to $67,715, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($33,894 compared to $33,437, a difference of 1.4%).
Menominee vs Creek Income
Income MetricMenomineeCreek
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$34,578
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,563
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Tragic
$68,423
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Tragic
$37,884
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,581
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,894
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,907
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$79,358
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$76,903
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,719
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
27.1%

Menominee vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Menominee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.7%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.81%), single mother poverty (37.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and single female poverty (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Menominee vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricMenomineeCreek
Poverty
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.3%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
37.1%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
14.1%

Menominee vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Menominee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (10.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 114.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 48.8%), and female unemployment (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
Menominee vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMenomineeCreek
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
7.0%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
10.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%

Menominee vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Menominee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (75.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Menominee vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMenomineeCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.6%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.3%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.9%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.7%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.7%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Tragic
77.7%

Menominee vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Menominee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 62.0%), births to unmarried women (51.1% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 36.1%), and single mother households (9.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.96%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Menominee vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMenomineeCreek
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.30
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.3%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.1%
Tragic
37.6%

Menominee vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 51.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 44.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 27.6%).
Menominee vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMenomineeCreek
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
7.2%

Menominee vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Menominee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.4%), bachelor's degree (27.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and college, under 1 year (57.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.060%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Menominee vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricMenomineeCreek
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.0%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.6%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Menominee vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.6%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age over 75 (52.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Menominee vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricMenomineeCreek
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.3%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.8%