Slavic vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Slavic
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Slavs
Creek
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Slavic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,296,116 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.279% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 278.7 Creek.
Slavic vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $78,960, a difference of 30.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $74,847, a difference of 28.8%), and median household income ($86,398 compared to $67,715, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $45,371, a difference of 11.4%), and median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $33,437, a difference of 18.5%).
Income Metric | Slavic | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,049 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Good $105,144 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,398 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,470 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,390 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,613 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,563 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,377 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,629 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,709 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 27.1% |
Slavic vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 45.0%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and single father poverty (17.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 14.2%).
Poverty Metric | Slavic | Creek |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.0% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Average 21.1% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Slavic vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Slavic | Creek |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Slavic vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Slavic | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.6% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 77.7% |
Slavic vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.7%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Slavic | Creek |
Family Households | Poor 64.0% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Excellent 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.6% | Tragic 37.6% |
Slavic vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 0.85%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Slavic | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Slavic vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Creek communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 47.4%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.9%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%).
Education Level Metric | Slavic | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.7% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.7% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.6% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.9% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.3% |
Slavic vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 44.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.1%).
Disability Metric | Slavic | Creek |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |